Muse Wonder Full 1.0

MetaKey muse-wonder-full-1.0

Rank
#65
by active users
Active users
5
No change from 5 active users in the previous 7 days. vs previous 7 days
Adoption
0.8%
of 609 accounts
Tokens
292M
cache included
Est. cost
$50
at public list prices
First seen
Oct 12, 2026
in any submission

Nov 6–12, 2026 (UTC)609 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 12, 2026, 07:50 UTCHow we count

Daily active users

Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.

0 active users on Nov 12, 2026

Daily active users for Muse Wonder Full 1.0, Nov 6, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026. Peak 3. Use the left and right arrow keys to read each day.320
Show daily values
Daily active users and tokens for Muse Wonder Full 1.0
Date (UTC)Active usersTokens
Nov 6, 2026215.8M
Nov 7, 20263140.5M
Nov 8, 2026243.2M
Nov 9, 202625.5M
Nov 10, 2026133.8M
Nov 11, 2026153.3M
Nov 12, 202600

Token mix

How the 292M tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.

  • Input2.8%
  • Output0.2%
  • Cache read97%
  • Cache write0%
  • Reasoning0.1%

Agents that carry Muse Wonder Full 1.0

Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.

  1. Muse Code100% of this model's tokens4active users
  2. Oh My Pi<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
  3. Hermes Agent<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users

Benchmarks

The best result for Muse Wonder Full 1.0 in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark.

All benchmarks
  • WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena
    1,726
    Rank #6 of 110 matched modelsMaxPublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab)

Not evaluated: Epoch Capabilities Index, GPQA Diamond, Humanity's Last Exam, FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2), SimpleQA Verified, Terminal-Bench 4.1, CursorBench, DeepSWE, FrontierSWE, Agent Arena. A missing result is not a score of zero.

Pricing

models.dev does not list Muse Wonder Full 1.0, so Tokscale has no list price or price estimate for it.

Specs

models.dev does not list Muse Wonder Full 1.0, so Tokscale has no specs for it.

Top public profiles

Public profiles that used Muse Wonder Full 1.0 most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.

  1. 1Ziyang Fang@Fangziyang0910195.6Mtokens—est. cost4active daysno price · 4 active days
  2. 2Yags@whyyagswhy87.1Mtokens$50est. cost2active days$50 est. cost · 2 active days
  3. 3Alec Z@offcall6.2Mtokens—est. cost1active daysno price · 1 active days
  4. 4Zenco@notzenco3Mtokens—est. cost1active daysno price · 1 active days
  5. 5Brad Lishman@bradlishman132Ktokens—est. cost3active daysno price · 3 active days

More from Meta

Other Meta models in the same period, by active users.

  1. Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor2.3% adoption14active users
  2. Muse Spark 1.31.3% adoption8active users
  3. Muse Wonder 1.00.5% adoption3active users
  4. Muse Wonder Full 1.0 Contributor0.3% adoption2active users
  5. Muse Wonder 1.0 Contributor0.2% adoption1active users
  6. Muse Wonder 1.0 High0.2% adoption1active users
All models

Sources and attribution

Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.

  • LMArenaWebDev Arena and Agent Arena leaderboards.CC BY 4.0 · Retrieved Oct 21, 2026 · Data through Oct 19, 2026LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), Hugging Face.
  • TokscaleActive users, tokens and token mix from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.How we count