Muse Wonder 1.0
MetaKey muse-wonder-1.0Also reported as meta/muse-wonder-1.0
- Rank
- #76
- by active users
- Active users
- 17
- Up 8 from 9 active users in the previous 30 days. vs previous 30 days
- Adoption
- 1.8%
- of 958 accounts
- Tokens
- 408.2M
- cache included
- Est. cost
- $170
- at public list prices
- First seen
- Oct 12, 2026
- in any submission
Oct 14 – Nov 12, 2026 (UTC)958 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 12, 2026, 00:36 UTCHow we count
Daily active users
Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.
0 active users on Nov 12, 2026
Show daily values
| Date (UTC) | Active users | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | 4 | 43.6M |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 3 | 60.4M |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 3 | 23M |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4 | 27.6M |
| Oct 18, 2026 | 3 | 13.9M |
| Oct 19, 2026 | 3 | 50.1M |
| Oct 20, 2026 | 2 | 4.4M |
| Oct 21, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 22, 2026 | 3 | 10.8M |
| Oct 23, 2026 | 2 | 37.6M |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1 | 13.3M |
| Oct 25, 2026 | 2 | 27.1M |
| Oct 26, 2026 | 2 | 1.5M |
| Oct 27, 2026 | 3 | 43.3M |
| Oct 28, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 29, 2026 | 1 | 514K |
| Oct 30, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2 | 9.6M |
| Nov 1, 2026 | 1 | 22.3K |
| Nov 2, 2026 | 2 | 7.1M |
| Nov 3, 2026 | 2 | 28.9M |
| Nov 4, 2026 | 2 | 2.6M |
| Nov 5, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 6, 2026 | 1 | 176K |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3 | 2.7M |
| Nov 8, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 9, 2026 | 1 | 44.5K |
| Nov 10, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 11, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 12, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
Token mix
How the 408.2M tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.
- Input7.7%
- Output0.4%
- Cache read92%
- Cache write0%
- Reasoning0.3%
Agents that carry Muse Wonder 1.0
Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.
Muse Code58% of this model's tokens10active users
Codebuff11% of this model's tokens1active users
OpenCode11% of this model's tokens1active users
Junie9.6% of this model's tokens1active users
Hermes Agent5.6% of this model's tokens1active users
Claude Code3.4% of this model's tokens1active users
ZCode2.0% of this model's tokens1active users
Oh My Pi0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Aside<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Pi<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Benchmarks
The best result for Muse Wonder 1.0 in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark.
- Epoch Capabilities IndexOverall · Epoch AI161.8
Epoch Capabilities Index: 161.8
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 159.4–165.4
- Unit
- ECI
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #12 of 160 matched modelsNo conditions reportedModel released Oct 12, 2026Source: epoch.ai (opens in a new tab) - CursorBenchAgentic coding · Cursor, collected by Epoch AI50.4%
CursorBench: 50.4%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder Max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Best of 6 reported results for this model.
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Show 5 more results with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as Muse Wonder Extra High48.2%
CursorBench: 48.2%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder Extra High
- Conditions
- XHigh
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Muse Wonder High46.1%
CursorBench: 46.1%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder High
- Conditions
- High
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Muse Wonder Medium45.2%
CursorBench: 45.2%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder Medium
- Conditions
- Medium
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Muse Wonder Low41.7%
CursorBench: 41.7%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder Low
- Conditions
- Low
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Muse Wonder Minimal34.2%
CursorBench: 34.2%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder Minimal
- Conditions
- Minimal
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena1,652
WebDev Arena: 1,652
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- Conditions
- Max
- Interval
- 1638–1665
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
- Agent ArenaAgents · LMArena+0.04
Agent Arena: +0.04
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- Muse Wonder (Max)
- Conditions
- Max · Arena Agent Mode
- Interval
- 0.02 to 0.05
- Unit
- net improvement
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #12 of 48 matched modelsMax · Arena Agent ModePublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab) - FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)Reasoning · Epoch AI82.1%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): 82.1%
- Model
- Muse Wonder 1.0
- Listed as
- muse-wonder-1.0_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % solved
- Run date
- Oct 12, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 93.7%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 95%. Differences between top models are small.
Pricing
List prices from models.dev in US dollars per 1M tokens, retrieved Oct 21, 2026. Meta is the lab's own API and the reference price for the estimates below.
Price at real agent usageEstimate at list prices
What 1M tokens cost at the reference list price when they split into input, output and cache the way Tokscale users' agents used them. It is not what anyone paid.
- At this model's mix
- $0.62
- Est. per 1M tokens
92% cache reads - At the community mix
- $0.40
- Est. per 1M tokens
96% cache reads - 3:1 input/output blend
- $8
- Per 1M tokens at list prices
No cache
Cache reads were 92% of Muse Wonder 1.0 tokens in the last 30 days and 96% of all tokens. The 3:1 blend, (3 × input + output) ÷ 4, is the usual comparison and ignores cache.
Assumptions
- Meta list prices per 1M tokens: input $4, output $20, cache read $0.20.
- This model's mix is its own input, output, cache and reasoning tokens in the last 30 days.
- The community mix is the tokens of every identified model in the last 30 days.
- This is an estimate at list prices, not what anyone paid.
- Reasoning tokens are priced as output.
- Long-context tiers, batch pricing and discounts are not applied.
- Token mixes come from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.
- No cache-write price is listed, so cache writes are priced as input.
List prices by provider
- MetaReference
muse-wonder-1.0$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context - Vercel AI Gateway
meta/muse-wonder-1.0$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context
Specs
From models.dev (MIT), retrieved Oct 21, 2026, as the lab or the first listed provider reports them. A dash means models.dev does not list the value.
- Context window
- 1.05M tokens
- Max output
- 131K tokens
- Input
- Text, Image, Video, PDF, Audio
- Output
- Text
- Knowledge cutoff
- — not listed
- Release date
- Oct 12, 2026
- Open weights
- No
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
Top public profiles
Public profiles that used Muse Wonder 1.0 most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.
- 1
siddicky@siddicky90.5Mtokens$61est. cost14active days$61 est. cost · 14 active days
- 2
Zeyu Fu@PeterPonyu53Mtokens$40est. cost8active days$40 est. cost · 8 active days
- 3
Sunghyun Cho@anaclumos51.2Mtokens$5est. cost1active days$5 est. cost · 1 active days
- 4
Baptiste@BaptisteFaisy44.1Mtokens—est. cost2active daysno price · 2 active days
- 5
Sachee@comicsansbestfont43.1Mtokens$16est. cost1active days$16 est. cost · 1 active days
- 6
ualtinok@ualtinok39.2Mtokens$30est. cost2active days$30 est. cost · 2 active days
- 7
Ziyang Fang@Fangziyang091028Mtokens$7est. cost1active days$7 est. cost · 1 active days
- 8
Sam Foreman@saforem223Mtokens$6est. cost1active days$6 est. cost · 1 active days
- 9
gordyf@gordyf14.3Mtokens<$1est. cost2active days<$1 est. cost · 2 active days
- 10
Satyam Garodia@Satyamgarodia13.8Mtokens—est. cost4active daysno price · 4 active days
More from Meta
Other Meta models in the same period, by active users.
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor6.1% adoption58active users
- Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Free4.9% adoption47active users
- Muse Spark 1.32.2% adoption21active users
- Muse Wonder Full 1.01.0% adoption10active users
- Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor0.6% adoption6active users
- Muse Wonder 1.0 Contributor0.5% adoption5active users
Sources and attribution
Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.