Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
GoogleKey gemini-3.1-pro-previewAlso reported as google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, vertex_ai/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gemini 3.1 pro preview, gh/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, models/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gemini-cli/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, vertex/gemini-3.1-pro-preview, nous/google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
- Rank
- #183
- by active users
- Active users
- 5
- Down 3 from 8 active users in the previous 30 days. vs previous 30 days
- Adoption
- 0.5%
- of 960 accounts
- Tokens
- 7.2M
- cache included
- Est. cost
- $5
- at public list prices
- First seen
- Dec 1, 2025
- in any submission
Oct 14 – Nov 12, 2026 (UTC)960 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 12, 2026, 04:16 UTCHow we count
Daily active users
Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.
0 active users on Nov 12, 2026
Show daily values
| Date (UTC) | Active users | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | 1 | 165K |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 1 | 23.9K |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 18, 2026 | 1 | 4.1M |
| Oct 19, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 20, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 21, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 22, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 23, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1 | 229K |
| Oct 25, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 26, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 27, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 28, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 29, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 30, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 1, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 3, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 4, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 5, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 6, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 8, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 9, 2026 | 1 | 2.6M |
| Nov 10, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 11, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 12, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
Token mix
How the 7.2M tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.
- Input14%
- Output0.4%
- Cache read84%
- Cache write0%
- Reasoning1.4%
Agents that carry Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.
OpenCode94% of this model's tokens2active users
Oh My Pi3.2% of this model's tokens1active users
Pi2.3% of this model's tokens1active users
Antigravity CLI0.3% of this model's tokens1active users
Benchmarks
The best result for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark.
- Epoch Capabilities IndexOverall · Epoch AI155.3
Epoch Capabilities Index: 155.3
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 153.3–158.1
- Unit
- ECI
- Model released
- Feb 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #35 of 160 matched modelsNo conditions reportedModel released Feb 19, 2026Source: epoch.ai (opens in a new tab) - DeepSWEAgentic coding · Datacurve, collected by Epoch AI11.7%
DeepSWE: 11.7%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- gemini-3-1-pro-preview (high)
- Conditions
- High · mini-swe-agent
- Interval
- 10.2–13.2%
- Unit
- pass@1
- Model released
- Feb 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · DeepSWE results by Datacurve, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #26 of 26 matched modelsHigh · mini-swe-agentModel released Feb 19, 2026Source: deepswe.datacurve.ai (opens in a new tab) - WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena1,447
WebDev Arena: 1,447
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 1442–1452
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #62 of 110 matched modelsNo conditions reportedPublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab) - Agent ArenaAgents · LMArena−0.04
Agent Arena: −0.04
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Conditions
- Arena Agent Mode
- Interval
- -0.05 to -0.03
- Unit
- net improvement
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #37 of 48 matched modelsArena Agent ModePublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab) - GPQA DiamondReasoning · Epoch AI94.4%
GPQA Diamond: 94.4%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview_high
- Conditions
- High
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Aug 6, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Best of 2 reported results for this model.
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 96.4%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 97%. Differences between top models are small.
Show 1 more result with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as gemini-3.1-pro-preview94.1%
GPQA Diamond: 94.1%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Feb 20, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Humanity's Last ExamReasoning · Center for AI Safety and Scale AI, collected by Epoch AI46.4%
Humanity's Last Exam: 46.4%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (thinking high)
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Unit
- % correct
- Model released
- Feb 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Humanity's Last Exam results, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #3 of 40 matched modelsNo conditions reportedModel released Feb 19, 2026Source: lastexam.ai (opens in a new tab) - FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)Reasoning · Epoch AI59.6%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): 59.6%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Unit
- % solved
- Run date
- Jun 11, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #39 of 86 matched modelsNo conditions reportedRun date Jun 11, 2026Source: epoch.ai (opens in a new tab)Near its ceiling: the top score is 93.7%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 95%. Differences between top models are small.
- SimpleQA VerifiedKnowledge · Epoch AI73.5%
SimpleQA Verified: 73.5%
- Model
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Listed as
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview_high
- Conditions
- High
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Aug 10, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Pricing
List prices from models.dev in US dollars per 1M tokens, retrieved Oct 21, 2026. Google is the lab's own API and the reference price for the estimates below.
Price at real agent usageEstimate at list prices
What 1M tokens cost at the reference list price when they split into input, output and cache the way Tokscale users' agents used them. It is not what anyone paid.
- At this model's mix
- $0.67
- Est. per 1M tokens
84% cache reads - At the community mix
- $0.30
- Est. per 1M tokens
96% cache reads - 3:1 input/output blend
- $4.50
- Per 1M tokens at list prices
No cache
Cache reads were 84% of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview tokens in the last 30 days and 96% of all tokens. The 3:1 blend, (3 × input + output) ÷ 4, is the usual comparison and ignores cache.
Assumptions
- Google list prices per 1M tokens: input $2, output $12, cache read $0.20.
- This model's mix is its own input, output, cache and reasoning tokens in the last 30 days.
- The community mix is the tokens of every identified model in the last 30 days.
- This is an estimate at list prices, not what anyone paid.
- Reasoning tokens are priced as output.
- Long-context tiers, batch pricing and discounts are not applied.
- Token mixes come from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.
- No cache-write price is listed, so cache writes are priced as input.
List prices by provider
- GoogleReference
gemini-3.1-pro-preview$2 input per 1M tokens$12 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context - Vertex
gemini-3.1-pro-preview$2 input per 1M tokens$12 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context - OpenRouter
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview$2 input per 1M tokens$12 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$0.38 cache write per 1M tokens1.05M tokens of context - Vercel AI Gateway
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview$2 input per 1M tokens$12 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1M tokens of context
Specs
From models.dev (MIT), retrieved Oct 21, 2026, as the lab or the first listed provider reports them. A dash means models.dev does not list the value.
- Context window
- 1.05M tokens
- Max output
- 66K tokens
- Input
- Text, Image, Video, Audio, PDF
- Output
- Text
- Knowledge cutoff
- Jan 2025
- Release date
- Feb 19, 2026
- Open weights
- No
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
Top public profiles
Public profiles that used Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.
- 1
AdEx-Partners-DE@AdEx-Partners-DE4.1Mtokens$3est. cost1active days$3 est. cost · 1 active days
- 2
皓@hpware2.6Mtokens$1est. cost1active days$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 3
Journey Hwang@journeyWorker229Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 4
Alex Gorbatchev@alexgorbatchev165Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 5
NIHAL NIHALANI@nihalnihalani23.9Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
More from Google
Other Google models in the same period, by active users.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash N15% adoption140active users
- Gemini 4 Argon8.5% adoption82active users
- Gemini 4 Argon Trial7.9% adoption76active users
- Gemini 3.8 Flash6.9% adoption66active users
- Gemini 3.8 Flash Tiered3.8% adoption36active users
- Gemini 4 Argon High1.8% adoption17active users
Sources and attribution
Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.