DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeekKey deepseek-v4-proAlso reported as deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro, deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-pro, dynamic/deepseek-v4-pro, cmd/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro, cline-pass/deepseek-v4-pro, opencode-go/deepseek-v4-pro, ocg/deepseek-v4-pro, fireworks/deepseek-v4-pro, codebuddy/deepseek-v4-pro, cr/deepseek-v4-pro, opengateway/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro, cmc/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro, combo/deepseek-v4-pro, personal/deepseek-v4-pro, clinepass/deepseek-v4-pro, ds/deepseek-v4-pro, hcnsec/deepseek-v4-pro, pecut/deepseek-v4-pro, openrouter/deepseek-v4-pro, qoder/deepseek-v4-pro
- Rank
- #41
- by active users
- Active users
- 10
- Down 3 from 13 active users in the previous 7 days. vs previous 7 days
- Adoption
- 1.6%
- of 618 accounts
- Tokens
- 412.4M
- cache included
- Est. cost
- $35
- at public list prices
- First seen
- Apr 24, 2026
- in any submission
Nov 8–14, 2026 (UTC)618 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 14, 2026, 01:58 UTCHow we count
Daily active users
Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.
0 active users on Nov 14, 2026
Show daily values
| Date (UTC) | Active users | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2026 | 2 | 4.3M |
| Nov 9, 2026 | 4 | 113M |
| Nov 10, 2026 | 4 | 234.1M |
| Nov 11, 2026 | 5 | 55.3M |
| Nov 12, 2026 | 3 | 4.2M |
| Nov 13, 2026 | 1 | 1.5M |
| Nov 14, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
Token mix
How the 412.4M tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.
- Input1.9%
- Output0.6%
- Cache read97%
- Cache write0%
- Reasoning<0.1%
Agents that carry DeepSeek V4 Pro
Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.
Pi93% of this model's tokens2active users
Hermes Agent5.6% of this model's tokens1active users
OpenCode0.9% of this model's tokens3active users
OpenClaw0.3% of this model's tokens1active users
Claude Code0.2% of this model's tokens3active users- cc-mirror/curl<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Benchmarks
The best result for DeepSeek V4 Pro in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark.
- Epoch Capabilities IndexOverall · Epoch AI150.2
Epoch Capabilities Index: 150.2
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 148.4–152.0
- Unit
- ECI
- Model released
- Apr 24, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #66 of 158 matched modelsNo conditions reportedModel released Apr 24, 2026Source: epoch.ai (opens in a new tab) - WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena1,582
WebDev Arena: 1,582
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813)
- Conditions
- High
- Interval
- 1573–1592
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Best of 2 reported results for this model.
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Show 1 more result with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as DeepSeek-V4-Pro1,447
WebDev Arena: 1,447
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 1441–1454
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
- Agent ArenaAgents · LMArena−0.00
Agent Arena: −0.00
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro (High, 20260813)
- Conditions
- High · Arena Agent Mode
- Interval
- -0.02 to 0.02
- Unit
- net improvement
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #30 of 48 matched modelsHigh · Arena Agent ModePublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab) - GPQA DiamondReasoning · Epoch AI90.9%
GPQA Diamond: 90.9%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_high
- Conditions
- High
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Aug 6, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Best of 3 reported results for this model.
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 96.5%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 97%. Differences between top models are small.
Show 2 more results with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as deepseek-v4-pro_max89.6%
GPQA Diamond: 89.6%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Jun 16, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as deepseek-v4-pro_none73.2%
GPQA Diamond: 73.2%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_none
- Conditions
- No reasoning
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Aug 6, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)Reasoning · Epoch AI45.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): 45.3%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % solved
- Run date
- Jun 17, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 95.1%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 95%. Differences between top models are small.
- SimpleQA VerifiedKnowledge · Epoch AI47.0%
SimpleQA Verified: 47.0%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Aug 27, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- SWE-bench VerifiedHistory · Epoch AI77.6%
SWE-bench Verified: 77.6%
- Model
- DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Listed as
- deepseek-v4-pro_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % resolved
- Run date
- Jun 18, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
History only. Newer agentic coding benchmarks are on the main board.
Pricing
List prices from models.dev in US dollars per 1M tokens, retrieved Nov 12, 2026. Azure is the reference price for the estimates below. It is the first provider listed; models.dev lists no price from the lab's own API.
Price at real agent usageEstimate at list prices
What 1M tokens cost at the reference list price when they split into input, output and cache the way Tokscale users' agents used them. It is not what anyone paid.
- At this model's mix
- $1.75
- Est. per 1M tokens
97% cache reads - At the community mix
- $1.75
- Est. per 1M tokens
96% cache reads - 3:1 input/output blend
- $2.17
- Per 1M tokens at list prices
No cache
Cache reads were 97% of DeepSeek V4 Pro tokens in the last 7 days and 96% of all tokens. The 3:1 blend, (3 × input + output) ÷ 4, is the usual comparison and ignores cache.
Assumptions
- Azure list prices per 1M tokens: input $1.74, output $3.48.
- This model's mix is its own input, output, cache and reasoning tokens in the last 7 days.
- The community mix is the tokens of every identified model in the last 7 days.
- This is an estimate at list prices, not what anyone paid.
- Reasoning tokens are priced as output.
- Long-context tiers, batch pricing and discounts are not applied.
- Token mixes come from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.
- No cache-read price is listed, so cache reads are priced as input.
- No cache-write price is listed, so cache writes are priced as input.
List prices by provider
- AzureReference
deepseek-v4-pro$1.74 input per 1M tokens$3.48 output per 1M tokensCache read not listedCache write not listed1M tokens of context - OpenRouter
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro$0.96 input per 1M tokens$1.91 output per 1M tokens$0.08 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context - Vercel AI Gateway
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro$1.32 input per 1M tokens$3.96 output per 1M tokens$0.13 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context - Deep Infra
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro$1.30 input per 1M tokens$2.60 output per 1M tokens$0.10 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed1.05M tokens of context
Specs
From models.dev (MIT), retrieved Nov 12, 2026, as the lab or the first listed provider reports them. A dash means models.dev does not list the value.
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Max output
- 384K tokens
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Knowledge cutoff
- May 2025
- Release date
- Apr 24, 2026
- Open weights
- Yes
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
Top public profiles
Public profiles that used DeepSeek V4 Pro most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.
- 1
samzong@samzong383.9Mtokens$31est. cost4active days$31 est. cost · 4 active days
- 2
Arthur Brownlee IV@nulluserid25.8Mtokens$3est. cost6active days$3 est. cost · 6 active days
- 3
Vincent Koc@vincentkoc1.3Mtokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 4
Gordon Lee@g0rdonL420Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 5
Joscha Götzer@JosXa334Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 6
Tushar@iota31320Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 7
SunShine@HaomingJu314Ktokens<$1est. cost2active days<$1 est. cost · 2 active days
- 8
luke eldridge@lkeld17Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 9
Gabriel@Delitefully8.6Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
- 10
如是@MiFaZhan117tokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
More from DeepSeek
Other DeepSeek models in the same period, by active users.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash16% adoption96active users
- DeepSeek Flash6.0% adoption37active users
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Free6.0% adoption37active users
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10175.2% adoption32active users
- DeepSeek V4 Flash1.5% adoption9active users
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1M1.1% adoption7active users
Sources and attribution
Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.