DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeekKey deepseek-v3.2Also reported as deepseek/deepseek-v3.2, deepseek-ai/deepseek-v3.2, pro/deepseek-ai/deepseek-v3.2, deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2
- Rank
- #819
- by active users
- Active users
- 1
- No change from 1 active users in the previous 30 days. vs previous 30 days
- Adoption
- 0.1%
- of 958 accounts
- Tokens
- 67.1K
- cache included
- Est. cost
- <$1
- at public list prices
- First seen
- Dec 1, 2025
- in any submission
Oct 14 – Nov 12, 2026 (UTC)958 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 12, 2026, 02:53 UTCHow we count
Daily active users
Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.
0 active users on Nov 12, 2026
Show daily values
| Date (UTC) | Active users | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 1 | 67.1K |
| Oct 16, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 18, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 19, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 20, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 21, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 22, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 23, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 25, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 26, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 27, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 28, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 29, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 30, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 1, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 2, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 3, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 4, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 5, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 6, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 8, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 9, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 10, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 11, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 12, 2026 | 0 | 0 |
Token mix
How the 67.1K tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.
- Input50%
- Output0.3%
- Cache read50%
- Cache write0%
- Reasoning0%
Agents that carry DeepSeek V3.2
Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.
OpenCode100% of this model's tokens1active users
Benchmarks
The best result for DeepSeek V3.2 in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark.
- WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena1,362
WebDev Arena: 1,362
- Model
- DeepSeek V3.2
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 1353–1371
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Best of 2 reported results for this model.
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #86 of 110 matched modelsNo conditions reportedPublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab)Show 1 more result with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as DeepSeek-V3.21,326
WebDev Arena: 1,326
- Model
- DeepSeek V3.2
- Listed as
- DeepSeek-V3.2
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 1318–1334
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Pricing
List prices from models.dev in US dollars per 1M tokens, retrieved Oct 21, 2026. Amazon Bedrock is the reference price for the estimates below. It is the first provider listed; models.dev lists no price from the lab's own API.
Price at real agent usageEstimate at list prices
What 1M tokens cost at the reference list price when they split into input, output and cache the way Tokscale users' agents used them. It is not what anyone paid.
- At this model's mix
- $0.62
- Est. per 1M tokens
50% cache reads - At the community mix
- $0.62
- Est. per 1M tokens
96% cache reads - 3:1 input/output blend
- $0.93
- Per 1M tokens at list prices
No cache
Cache reads were 50% of DeepSeek V3.2 tokens in the last 30 days and 96% of all tokens. The 3:1 blend, (3 × input + output) ÷ 4, is the usual comparison and ignores cache.
Assumptions
- Amazon Bedrock list prices per 1M tokens: input $0.62, output $1.85.
- This model's mix is its own input, output, cache and reasoning tokens in the last 30 days.
- The community mix is the tokens of every identified model in the last 30 days.
- This is an estimate at list prices, not what anyone paid.
- Reasoning tokens are priced as output.
- Long-context tiers, batch pricing and discounts are not applied.
- Token mixes come from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.
- No cache-read price is listed, so cache reads are priced as input.
- No cache-write price is listed, so cache writes are priced as input.
List prices by provider
- Amazon BedrockReference
deepseek.v3.2$0.62 input per 1M tokens$1.85 output per 1M tokensCache read not listedCache write not listed164K tokens of context - OpenRouter
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2$0.28 input per 1M tokens$0.42 output per 1M tokens$0.03 cache read per 1M tokensCache write not listed164K tokens of context - Vercel AI Gateway
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2$0.62 input per 1M tokens$1.85 output per 1M tokensCache read not listedCache write not listed128K tokens of context
Specs
From models.dev (MIT), retrieved Oct 21, 2026, as the lab or the first listed provider reports them. A dash means models.dev does not list the value.
- Context window
- 164K tokens
- Max output
- 66K tokens
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Knowledge cutoff
- Jul 2024
- Release date
- Dec 1, 2025
- Open weights
- Yes
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
Top public profiles
Public profiles that used DeepSeek V3.2 most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.
- 1
BitmanAlan@BitmanAlan67.1Ktokens<$1est. cost1active days<$1 est. cost · 1 active days
More from DeepSeek
Other DeepSeek models in the same period, by active users.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash23% adoption225active users
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Free15% adoption141active users
- DeepSeek Flash13% adoption121active users
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10177.9% adoption76active users
- DeepSeek V4 Flash5.3% adoption51active users
- DeepSeek V4 Pro5.3% adoption51active users
Sources and attribution
Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.