Claude Opus 5.5
AnthropicKey claude-opus-5-5Also reported as anthropic/claude-opus-5-5, router_client:claude/claude-opus-5-5, claude/claude-opus-5-5, cc/claude-opus-5-5, kiro/claude-opus-5-5, sub2api-claude/claude-opus-5-5, teamclaude/claude-opus-5-5, kt.kim/claude-opus-5-5, devin/claude-opus-5-5, s6o/claude-opus-5-5, auto/claude-opus-5-5, kr/claude-opus-5-5, workbuddy/claude-opus-5-5, magpie/factory/claude-opus-5-5, router_client:unknown/claude-opus-5-5, ccs-github/claude-opus-5-5, mm0e-com/auto/claude-opus-5-5, claude-opus-5.5, cursor/claude-opus-5-5, api/claude-opus-5-5
- Rank
- #1
- by active users
- Active users
- 434
- Down 98 from 532 active users in the previous 7 days. vs previous 7 days
- Adoption
- 71%
- of 610 accounts
- Tokens
- 1.7T
- cache included
- Est. cost
- $652.2K
- at public list prices
- First seen
- Aug 26, 2026
- in any submission
Nov 6–12, 2026 (UTC)610 accounts100% of tokens from an identified modelData through Nov 12, 2026, 08:13 UTCHow we count
Daily active users
Distinct accounts that used this model on each UTC day.
104 active users on Nov 12, 2026
Show daily values
| Date (UTC) | Active users | Tokens |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2026 | 375 | 334.7B |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 302 | 305.6B |
| Nov 8, 2026 | 289 | 287.8B |
| Nov 9, 2026 | 332 | 295.3B |
| Nov 10, 2026 | 296 | 260.9B |
| Nov 11, 2026 | 242 | 196.3B |
| Nov 12, 2026 | 104 | 47.5B |
Token mix
How the 1.7T tokens split. Cache reads are usually most of an agent's tokens and are priced far below input.
- Input0.7%
- Output0.3%
- Cache read97%
- Cache write1.9%
- Reasoning<0.1%
Agents that carry Claude Opus 5.5
Each agent's share of this model's tokens, and how many accounts used the model through it.
Claude Code77% of this model's tokens400active users
Oh My Pi7.1% of this model's tokens26active users
Senpi (OmO Native)5.5% of this model's tokens25active users
Pi4.0% of this model's tokens14active users
OpenCode3.6% of this model's tokens8active users
Junie1.3% of this model's tokens1active users
Hermes Agent0.3% of this model's tokens10active users
Gajae Code0.2% of this model's tokens3active users
Aside0.2% of this model's tokens9active users
Synthetic0.2% of this model's tokens1active users
Reasonix0.2% of this model's tokens1active users
Codex CLI0.1% of this model's tokens3active users
DeepSeek Harness<0.1% of this model's tokens2active users
Antigravity CLI<0.1% of this model's tokens6active users
Antigravity<0.1% of this model's tokens5active users
ZCode<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Antigravity IDE Extension<0.1% of this model's tokens4active users
Droid<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Kiro<0.1% of this model's tokens1active users
Benchmarks
The best result for Claude Opus 5.5 in each benchmark Tokscale tracks. Each benchmark has its own unit, run conditions and source, so compare a score only with other models on the same benchmark. Rank is among the models Tokscale matched in that benchmark. Agent rows also show Tokscale usage through that agent, side by side with the score. Usage does not explain the score.
- Epoch Capabilities IndexOverall · Epoch AI168.5
Epoch Capabilities Index: 168.5
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Conditions
- Not reported
- Interval
- 165.6–171.8
- Unit
- ECI
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #4 of 158 matched modelsNo conditions reportedModel released Sep 22, 2026Source: epoch.ai (opens in a new tab) - Terminal-Bench 4.1Agentic coding · Terminal-Bench65.8%
Terminal-Bench 4.1: 65.8%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5
- Conditions
- Max · Claude Code
- Interval
- 62.6–68.9%
- Unit
- % resolved
- Published
- Nov 3, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Terminal-Bench 4.1 official leaderboard, tbench.ai
Rank #1 of 23 matched modelsMax · Claude CodePublished Nov 3, 2026Source: tbench.ai (opens in a new tab)
Tokscale usage: Claude Code carried 77% of Claude Opus 5.5 tokens in the last 7 days (400 active users). - CursorBenchAgentic coding · Cursor, collected by Epoch AI57.8%
CursorBench: 57.8%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5 Max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Best of 5 reported results for this model.
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Show 4 more results with other run conditionsHide the other results
- Listed as Opus 5.5 High56.0%
CursorBench: 56.0%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5 High
- Conditions
- High
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Opus 5.5 Extra High56.0%
CursorBench: 56.0%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5 Extra High
- Conditions
- XHigh
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Opus 5.5 Medium52.5%
CursorBench: 52.5%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5 Medium
- Conditions
- Medium
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- Listed as Opus 5.5 Low43.7%
CursorBench: 43.7%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Opus 5.5 Low
- Conditions
- Low
- Unit
- score
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · CursorBench results by Cursor, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
- FrontierSWEAgentic coding · FrontierSWE, collected by Epoch AI62.3%
FrontierSWE: 62.3%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Conditions
- Max · proximus
- Unit
- mean@5
- Model released
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · FrontierSWE results, collected by Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Rank #3 of 23 matched modelsMax · proximusModel released Sep 22, 2026Source: frontierswe.com (opens in a new tab) - WebDev ArenaWeb development · LMArena1,807
WebDev Arena: 1,807
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)
- Conditions
- Max
- Interval
- 1793–1821
- Unit
- Arena score
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
- Agent ArenaAgents · LMArena+0.20
Agent Arena: +0.20
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)
- Conditions
- Max · Arena Agent Mode
- Interval
- 0.18 to 0.23
- Unit
- net improvement
- Published
- Oct 19, 2026
- Retrieved
- Oct 21, 2026
Source · LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), CC BY 4.0
Rank #1 of 48 matched modelsMax · Arena Agent ModePublished Oct 19, 2026Source: huggingface.co (opens in a new tab) - GPQA DiamondReasoning · Epoch AI90.6%
GPQA Diamond: 90.6%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- claude-opus-5-5_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 96.5%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 97%. Differences between top models are small.
- FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)Reasoning · Epoch AI91.2%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2): 91.2%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- claude-opus-5-5_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % solved
- Run date
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Near its ceiling: the top score is 95.1%, and Epoch AI estimates the reachable maximum at 95%. Differences between top models are small.
- SimpleQA VerifiedKnowledge · Epoch AI72.2%
SimpleQA Verified: 72.2%
- Model
- Claude Opus 5.5
- Listed as
- claude-opus-5-5_max
- Conditions
- Max
- Unit
- % correct
- Run date
- Sep 22, 2026
- Retrieved
- Nov 12, 2026
Source · Epoch AI, ‘Capabilities & benchmarking’, epoch.ai/benchmarks (CC BY 4.0)
Pricing
List prices from models.dev in US dollars per 1M tokens, retrieved Nov 12, 2026. Anthropic is the lab's own API and the reference price for the estimates below.
Price at real agent usageEstimate at list prices
What 1M tokens cost at the reference list price when they split into input, output and cache the way Tokscale users' agents used them. It is not what anyone paid.
- At this model's mix
- $0.38
- Est. per 1M tokens
97% cache reads - At the community mix
- $0.41
- Est. per 1M tokens
96% cache reads - 3:1 input/output blend
- $8
- Per 1M tokens at list prices
No cache
Cache reads were 97% of Claude Opus 5.5 tokens in the last 7 days and 96% of all tokens. The 3:1 blend, (3 × input + output) ÷ 4, is the usual comparison and ignores cache.
Assumptions
- Anthropic list prices per 1M tokens: input $4, output $20, cache read $0.20, cache write $5.
- This model's mix is its own input, output, cache and reasoning tokens in the last 7 days.
- The community mix is the tokens of every identified model in the last 7 days.
- This is an estimate at list prices, not what anyone paid.
- Reasoning tokens are priced as output.
- Long-context tiers, batch pricing and discounts are not applied.
- Token mixes come from public Tokscale submissions. Hidden accounts are excluded.
List prices by provider
- AnthropicReference
claude-opus-5-5$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context - Amazon Bedrock
anthropic.claude-opus-5-5$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context - Vertex
claude-opus-5-5@default$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context - Vertex (Anthropic)
claude-opus-5-5@default$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context
Show 3 more providersShow fewer providers
- Azure
claude-opus-5-5$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context - OpenRouter
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context - Vercel AI Gateway
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5$4 input per 1M tokens$20 output per 1M tokens$0.20 cache read per 1M tokens$5 cache write per 1M tokens1M tokens of context
Specs
From models.dev (MIT), retrieved Nov 12, 2026, as the lab or the first listed provider reports them. A dash means models.dev does not list the value.
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Max output
- 128K tokens
- Input
- Text, Image, PDF
- Output
- Text
- Knowledge cutoff
- Jun 2026
- Release date
- Sep 22, 2026
- Open weights
- No
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Tool calling
- Yes
Top public profiles
Public profiles that used Claude Opus 5.5 most in this period, by tokens. Hidden accounts are never listed.
- 1
ualtinok@ualtinok78.1Btokens$21.2Kest. cost7active days$21.2K est. cost · 7 active days
- 2
Max Ghenis@MaxGhenis74.1Btokens$35.6Kest. cost6active days$35.6K est. cost · 6 active days
- 3
LJM@lee98www50.7Btokens$13.1Kest. cost7active days$13.1K est. cost · 7 active days
- 4
Øystein Krog@oysteinkrog47.7Btokens$16.7Kest. cost6active days$16.7K est. cost · 6 active days
- 5
YeonGyu-Kim@code-yeongyu43.7Btokens$18.1Kest. cost4active days$18.1K est. cost · 4 active days
- 6
Taemin Lee@taemmini39.9Btokens$18.4Kest. cost6active days$18.4K est. cost · 6 active days
- 7
thepianistdirector@thepianistdirector37.9Btokens$10.6Kest. cost6active days$10.6K est. cost · 6 active days
- 8
Journey Hwang@journeyWorker35.2Btokens$9.9Kest. cost6active days$9.9K est. cost · 6 active days
- 9
Leo (Junha) Jang@wkdd733.3Btokens$12.8Kest. cost5active days$12.8K est. cost · 5 active days
- 10
G Man@genx7up29.8Btokens$9.9Kest. cost6active days$9.9K est. cost · 6 active days
More from Anthropic
Other Anthropic models in the same period, by active users.
- Claude Sonnet 5.545% adoption277active users
- Claude Haiku 5.541% adoption249active users
- Claude Fable 5.232% adoption197active users
- Claude Fable 5.125% adoption154active users
- Claude Opus 58.2% adoption50active users
- Claude Opus 4.87.7% adoption47active users
Sources and attribution
Each score keeps its own source, unit and run conditions. Tokscale does not combine benchmarks into one score, and a missing score means the model was not evaluated, not that it scored zero.